Friday, March 3, 2017

(ETEC 527) Week 7: A Final Reflection on Teaching and Learning with Web 2.0 Tools


I was never much of a technology oriented person, my idea of integrating technology into my classroom instruction included a PowerPoint presentation and managing my online gradebook.  To my way of thinking “if something ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”  I’ve been dreading this class ever since I enrolled in my master’s program at TAMUC.  To be honest, it has been a genuine challenge overcoming my preconceived notions and personal demons in regards to Web 2.0 Tools and my ability to navigate and incorporate them into my classroom lessons.  This learning experience has taken me far, far away from my comfort zone and down the proverbial “Rabbit-Hole” kicking and screaming the entire way.  But, when the dust finally settled and I realized that the sky was in fact “Not Falling,” that I was still breathing, and that the worse had not come to pass, I discovered that I had a newfound appreciation for these Web 2.0 Tools which until now had always frightened and intimidated me.  

 
The only thing we have to fear is Fear Itself.  Franklin D. Roosevelt,
32nd U.S. President.


Web 2.0 Technology Tools have provided me with an invaluable avenue by which to communicate, share ideas, and collaborate with other professionals from around the globe.  They have given me the means by which to incorporate student-centered activities that are both engaging and informative into my instruction while also enriching the depth and breadth of their understanding of state mandated TEKS-based content.  These tools further grant me the means to evaluate student learning besides simply relying on paper and pencil assignments, quizzes, exams, and standardized test.  Applications such as: Prezi, Pixton Comic Creator, Kahoots!, ePortfolios, Protopage, Twitter, blogs, wikis, podcasts, Skype, Google Hangout, and even video presentations, should all be explored and, whenever possible, integrated into the classroom curriculum to broaden the means by which a student can choose to demonstrate their understanding of material while also having the added benefit of increasing their overall effective technology literacy.  Acquainting them with current technologies within the confines of the classroom, provides them a safe haven in which to practice and develop their skills, honing them for the day in which they join the work force with the necessary tools to be confident in their abilities as well as successful in their future careers. 

*I can think of very few jobs in today’s digital society which don’t require at least some sort of rudimentary knowledge of information literacy.  As we move into the 21st century, more and more reliance is being placed on integrated technology in the workplace, in our schools, and even within our homes. There is a shift in school and college instructional models across the nation towards a more “immersive” learning environment, an absolute necessity in today’s world economy if we hope to remain relevant and competitive in global markets.

 
“Never before in history has innovation offered the promise of so much, to so many, in so short a time.”  — Bill Gates, Microsoft cofounder.


However, all is not rainbows, unicorns, and lollipops when it comes to integrating technology especially within an educational setting; the other side of the coin is not so bright and shiny.  Technology is advancing so quickly that oftentimes school districts cannot keep up and their teachers are not adequately prepared to implement these new tools in a way which maximizes their potential.  The inevitability of technical problems also detracts from the attraction of integrating Web 2.0 tools into education.  The best lesson in the world can be brought to its’ knees quickly by an ill-timed technical glitch especially when being implemented by teachers who are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the technology.  Another disadvantage is when technology is used in the place of meaningful instruction, where no logical connection exists with the class curriculum, and the tool is simply being used as a “filler” of time.  Web 2.0 Tools should be used to enhance a student’s educational experience not replace it.  


Moderation in all things.”   Publius Terence Afer (190-159 B.C.), Roman Dramatist.

 
             It can also take a major commitment of time by the educator to learn, manage, and become proficient with new technologies within the classroom, time which many educators simply do not have to give.  The cost of technology can also be a prohibitive factor.  For instance, in the recent GISD bond election, monies were dedicated to the purchase of an iPad for every high school student in Garland ISD.  This school year, over 16,000 iPads were distributed for student use, free of charge, to encourage students to become innovative, creative, and prepared for the 21st-century jobs which await them. Although I could not find the exact amount of the $455.5 million dollars raised through the 2014 bond election which was dedicated to Garland’s Ready 1:1 program, I was able to find out that it costs the district several million dollars every year just to maintain this equipment, excluding any replacement costs.  An upgrade of this magnitude to a school's technology is something which is beyond the ability of many smaller districts within Texas and across the nation to accomplish based on their limited funding. 

 
With the integration of technology into education also comes a greater responsibility and need for teachers to teach students about digital citizenship and ethics. What is the best way for us as educators to get students to see the importance of online citizenship in a digital world?  The AECT Code of Ethics and the matter of “giving accurate credit to other’s work and published ideas” needs to stressed and implemented within the instructional design of a classroom setting which integrates Web 2.0 Tools into their lessons. How do copyright issues apply to asynchronous learning environments like the one I currently find myself participating in.  How does an instructor manage possible copyright issues in this type of environment which is always in a state of flux in regards to source materials or even safeguard the generated work and ideas of the students themselves?  And finally, today our students are relying more and more heavily on technology for their informational needs.  For a growing number of students, if their needs are not immediately met, many grow frustrated and disinterested in the curriculum.  This desire for immediate answers instead of delving deeper into the subject matter for a more complete understanding of the topic at hand can become problematic especially later on in their educational careers and when they enter the job world to realize that not everything in life is just “Point & Click.” 

 
*The level of inactivity in today’s youth is frightening.  I used to play outside with my friends from dawn to dusk during the summer, inventing and playing games, exploring the neighborhood, and overall leading a very active lifestyle.  Today, children still run… to their rooms to get on the internet for gaming or their phones to text and tweet.  Childhood obesity is at an all-time high, is technology solely to blame for this problem?  I think not but it does play a major role.

 
“America is the first culture in history which is in jeopardy of amusing itself to death.”  — John Piper, American Writer.

 
My responsibility moving forward as an educator is to make sure that I don’t get so set in my ways.  I need to make sure that I keep current with technology advances, receive the proper training, and continually work to incorporate them into my classroom instruction; becoming the best educator I can possibly be for my kids while also keeping in mind that technology is a two-sided sword.  When it works it cuts through much of the tedium and minutia of an instructional lesson but; when it doesn’t work, well, we end up bleeding for our art.  Always have a backup plan, just in case!   

Thursday, March 2, 2017

(ETEC 527) Week 7: Vanity Search (The Sequel)

Good Afternoon,

Well here I am, six weeks later, looking once again for evidence of my digital footprint to fulfill the 2nd Vanity Search assignment requirements for my ETEC 527 Web 2.0 Tech for Instruction class conducted on 2/27/2017.  For my investigation I will once again be using the search engines from Google, Yahoo, and Bing.  As before, I once again found personal information from these sources:

Whitepages.com, Texasmarrigerecords.org, Blogger.com, Orgsync.com, GISDprofessionallearning2015.sched.com, Arivify.com, Sortedbyname.com, and Ancientfaces.com.

*To see an accounting of each of these search results please see my previous Vanity Search blog entry from 1/21/2017 for details.

New Search Results:

ΓΌ           None, not a single new entry, not one even though I have added a new Blog Page, joined a class Wiki, and created new Google, Twitter, YouTube, Protopage, Diigo, and Kahoot! accounts.  The explanation however is very simple and deliberate.  Each of these accounts were created under my handle of Reemig67 instead of using my given name.  As I mentioned in my earlier post, “I’m a very private person without much a digital footprint” and I like my privacy.  I now enjoy the best of all worlds, I can enjoy the benefits of these Web 2.0 Tools without increasing my presence on the World Wide Web and, as an educator, now have an impressive arsenal of technology at my disposal which, when implemented, will drastically improve my instruction as I move forward in my teaching career.  I have left my comfort zone far, far behind but the payoff is that my lessons will now be more interesting, relevant, and engaging for my students.  In my book this is a win, win, win!    

*   Also, I searched again in vain for pictures, videos, news, etc… which may have been uploaded since this class began and again could find nothing.  Well, I shouldn’t say nothing.  I did find hundreds of pictures from my 2nd vanity search in Google, Yahoo, and Bing it’s just that none of them were of me, my wife, people we know, or anyone else related to me for that matter.  There was plenty of information, just none of it relevant.